Monday, June 25, 2007
Pearson Loses Frivoulous Suit Against Dry Cleaners. Update 8-15-07: Peason Appeals Case.
The judge ruled today in favor of the dry cleaner that was sued for losing a pair of pants. District of Columbia Superior Court Judge Judith Bartnoff ruled that Custom Cleaners did not violate the city's Consumer Protection Act as alleged by Roy L. Pearson, despite a sign saying "Satisfaction Guaranteed."
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
11 comments:
Now all citizens and none citizens can feel confident that the justice system still works.
Brenda
You called it pubmeister several months ago. FRIVOLOUS!
I think the ethics police ought to look into the motivation behind the suit a little more closely.
Victory for us Average Joes
Who pays for the shopkeeper's legal fees?
Pearson is to pay the legal bill.
The better question now is whether the Chungs will sue Pearson for abuse of process. I think they might.
YEAH!!
I don't know too many people who were pulling for Pearson.
Pearson had a novel theory, it is just that he apparently let a personal vendetta become the driving force behind the suit.
Aggressive Atty
YEAH!!
Frivolous is In the eyes of the beholder
Post a Comment