Does the first amendment protect bloggers? It sure should! The first amendment should protect all citizens. However, sometimes the interests of Justice override individual rights.
Courtesy of the A.P.:
Video Blogger Free After 226 Days in Prison
By DAVID KRAVETS
AP
DUBLIN, Calif. (April 4) - Video blogger Joshua Wolf, who spent a record-setting stint behind bars for refusing to turn over his footage of a chaotic 2005 street protest, walked out of prison after cutting a deal with prosecutors.
Wolf, 24, said Tuesday he was looking forward to "pizza and a beer" after having spent 226 days in prison - more than any journalist who's refused to testify. Under the deal, Wolf agreed to turn over the uncut video, which he also posted on his Web site Tuesday. But he refused to testify before the grand jury about the events at the protest or the identities of participants. "I will not under any circumstances testify before a grand jury," Wolf said. His prison time surpassed the previous record set by Vanessa Leggett, a Houston-based freelancer who served 168 days in 2001 and 2002 for declining to reveal unpublished material about a murder case. Wolf had been found in contempt for refusing to obey a subpoena to turn over his video from a July 2005 protest during the G-8 economic summit where anarchists were suspected of vandalizing a San Francisco police car. One city officer was struck during the rally and his skull was fractured.
Wolf, a freelancer, sold some footage to San Francisco television stations and posted it on his Web site, but refused to turn over unpublished material. The footage Wolf posted online Tuesday does not capture the alleged crimes authorities are investigating. Wolf's lawyers had argued that the First Amendment gave him the right to refuse the subpoena to turn over the rest of his tape. "Now that the fences of the law and the tradition that has protected the press are broken down, the people are the victims. The First Amendment, as I read it, was designed precisely to prevent that tragedy," Wolf said in prepared statement he read Tuesday on the steps of San Francisco City Hall. California's shield law allows reporters to keep sources and unpublished material secret. But there is no federal shield law protecting reporters from federal investigations. The National Writer's Union said in a statement that Wolf should never have been jailed. "The abuses visited on Josh and other journalists are part of an effort by governments at all levels to control the volume, flow and content of the information that reaches the public," the union said.
By DAVID KRAVETS
AP
DUBLIN, Calif. (April 4) - Video blogger Joshua Wolf, who spent a record-setting stint behind bars for refusing to turn over his footage of a chaotic 2005 street protest, walked out of prison after cutting a deal with prosecutors.
Wolf, 24, said Tuesday he was looking forward to "pizza and a beer" after having spent 226 days in prison - more than any journalist who's refused to testify. Under the deal, Wolf agreed to turn over the uncut video, which he also posted on his Web site Tuesday. But he refused to testify before the grand jury about the events at the protest or the identities of participants. "I will not under any circumstances testify before a grand jury," Wolf said. His prison time surpassed the previous record set by Vanessa Leggett, a Houston-based freelancer who served 168 days in 2001 and 2002 for declining to reveal unpublished material about a murder case. Wolf had been found in contempt for refusing to obey a subpoena to turn over his video from a July 2005 protest during the G-8 economic summit where anarchists were suspected of vandalizing a San Francisco police car. One city officer was struck during the rally and his skull was fractured.
Wolf, a freelancer, sold some footage to San Francisco television stations and posted it on his Web site, but refused to turn over unpublished material. The footage Wolf posted online Tuesday does not capture the alleged crimes authorities are investigating. Wolf's lawyers had argued that the First Amendment gave him the right to refuse the subpoena to turn over the rest of his tape. "Now that the fences of the law and the tradition that has protected the press are broken down, the people are the victims. The First Amendment, as I read it, was designed precisely to prevent that tragedy," Wolf said in prepared statement he read Tuesday on the steps of San Francisco City Hall. California's shield law allows reporters to keep sources and unpublished material secret. But there is no federal shield law protecting reporters from federal investigations. The National Writer's Union said in a statement that Wolf should never have been jailed. "The abuses visited on Josh and other journalists are part of an effort by governments at all levels to control the volume, flow and content of the information that reaches the public," the union said.
Posts
3 comments:
Iron Mike:
Serves the sucker right. Anyone who protects scum is well, scum. In my book that goes for lawyers and da press.
Iron Mike
Gosh Mike, I hate to go all constitutional on you, but have you ever heard of the Bill of Rights.
Freedom of Speech, Freedom of Press, Right to Due Process, these are all things are country's founding fathers fought and died to preserve.
If you have ever been on Market or Mission when the demonstrators are out, you would understand why US laws do not protect the Bay Area liberals--they are not US citizens and are not worth protecting. Hey idiot, you wasted you time making vanity plates for nothing honorable. Jail those liberals now.
Post a Comment