Monday, June 2, 2014

Trial By Combat ~by Legal Pub

A modern day jury trial has sometimes been describes as a street fight between men in suits.  Where does this imagery originate?   HBO Game of Thrones has recently dramatized trial by combat as an alternative to trial by jury on the facts.  Is there any historical basis for this alternative dispute resolution or is it something that was dreamed up by American author George R. R. Martin? 

"Judicial Duel" a/k/a "trial by combat" was a Germanic way to settle accusations in the absence of a confession or witness.  Unlike Martin's books or TV show, the two actual litigants fought each other, one on one.  The victor of the fight was judged as the winner of the dispute.  This Germanic law appears by reference throughout the Middle Ages in Europe. References to such duels virtually seems to disappear sometime toward the end of the 16th Century.  History reveals that some exceptions to the one on one rule have occurred.  For example, Louis the Pious required witnesses to fight each other concerning cases involving the clergy. In 2015, the Fourth Lateran Counsel officially discouraged the use of duels to settle disputes. Subsequently, Pope Honorius III requested that the Teuonic order cease the practice altogether. Nevertheless, in the 15th Century, fencing schools in Germany were still training people for such duels. (Was this one of the first law schools?) As of 1459 Thott codex specified that charges including desertion, murder, perjury, rape and  treason allowed for trial by combat in the absence of witnesses.

At some point in the 16th Century, a person facing trial by combat was allowed the assistance of a squire (a second.)  (This would appear to be analogous to today's "second chair" in a jury trial.) The squire would perform similar work to a "local counsel", arranging negotiations, forums and agreeing to certain equipment or weapons. The courtroom (dueling ground) was typically 60 square feet. The last litigant standing was declared the victor.

Those wishing to comment on the books of Martin or Game of Thrones may do so.  Spoiler alert to anyone who wants to be surprised by future shows, etc.


10 comments:

Anonymous said...

Two stories one day... Nice!

Anonymous said...

Love the show...

You know "the imp" will live, at least for now.

Anonymous said...

Great show... the Hound will die of infection!

Anonymous said...

The imp is going to demonstrate Oedipus complex and kill his father Lord Tywin

Anonymous said...

Hate Sunday evenings now that Game of Thrones season is finished

Anonymous said...

Can't wait until next season when Brand conquers the north beyond the wall.

Anonymous said...

What will happen with Daario next season?

Legal Eagle 7 said...

No one at Legal Pub is privy to what will happen to Daario next season. However, after that disclosure, some sources have suggested that Michiel Huisman, who plays Daario, is being promoted to the series regular for Season 5.

Legal Eagle 3 said...

Daario,doesn't have much of a role in the books. Dany sends Daario away for Yunkai to keep as a hostage. Dany's goal is to keep the peace with Yunkai.

In the book, Dany decides to marry Hizdahr zo Loraq to secure peace from rebels who are loyal to the slave masters. How it works out in the show is anyone's guess.

Anonymous said...

Dany and Darrio got it going on together. Look for a deviated plot from the book story line.