tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5166169592714997268.post7035634400841455015..comments2024-01-13T10:34:55.490-06:00Comments on Legal Pub: Bruce Jeffrey Pardo, Dressed As Santa, Massacres Invitees To His Ex-Inlaws Christmas PartyLegal Pubhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03464130635305514783noreply@blogger.comBlogger81125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5166169592714997268.post-42721355982765926682010-06-03T15:21:24.746-05:002010-06-03T15:21:24.746-05:00Comments on this thread are closed until the spamm...Comments on this thread are closed until the spammer pays the advertising bill that we will be sending and pursuing.Legal Pubhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03464130635305514783noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5166169592714997268.post-35033732328561926812010-05-24T07:35:26.161-05:002010-05-24T07:35:26.161-05:00Keep it strictly Pardo comments or Pardo related.Keep it strictly Pardo comments or Pardo related.Legal Pubhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03464130635305514783noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5166169592714997268.post-62667839058791557802010-01-12T16:10:11.368-06:002010-01-12T16:10:11.368-06:00Spammers will be billed $350.00 per spam as an adv...Spammers will be billed $350.00 per spam as an advertising fee.Legal Pubhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03464130635305514783noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5166169592714997268.post-1276026991072497332009-12-08T07:02:54.569-06:002009-12-08T07:02:54.569-06:00Nice guy...Nice guy...Legal Pubhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03464130635305514783noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5166169592714997268.post-22898058338777868762009-12-08T05:25:24.380-06:002009-12-08T05:25:24.380-06:00This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5166169592714997268.post-52883118923577913002009-01-14T08:37:00.000-06:002009-01-14T08:37:00.000-06:00Fire Dude:Not everyone here is an attorney. I syp...Fire Dude:<BR/><BR/>Not everyone here is an attorney. I sypathize and empathize with you.<BR/><BR/>I am a poor surfer. I been through the cleaners... (divorce.) But not all attorneys are rich. Nor are they all cold hearted. I figured they are not that much different than surfers. We have comorodotiy before contests because it makes it easier to tolerate losing to a friend. Based on my experience in and out of court, its the same way with the suites in court.<BR/><BR/>Legal Pub's chief editor is a cool attorney who is very sypathetic to divorced dads. He has provided us with a marriage strike forum and a proposed solution to domestic violence. Check it out. Bet you can find some similar thinking dudes without the violent anger.<BR/><BR/>Peace. Surf's up.<BR/><BR/>Surfer DudeAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5166169592714997268.post-23886688787061835472009-01-13T21:17:00.000-06:002009-01-13T21:17:00.000-06:00I AM RESPONDING TO THE LAST COMMENT, HOW CAN YOU ...I AM RESPONDING TO THE LAST COMMENT, HOW CAN YOU CHANGE A BOGUS CORRUPT SYSTEM WHEN IT IS CONTROLED BY THE BAY ATTORNEYS AND CORRUPT POLITICANS? THE JUDGES CONTROL THE OUTCOME OF THE CASE ON WHICH ATTORNEY THEY LIKE. THE MAN BE DAMMED . THEY SYTRETCH OUT THE CASE AS LONG AS POSSI BLE BECAUSE YOU HAVE MONEY THEN THE POOR WOMSN GETS EVERYTHINY SHE DESIRES. WHAT A FUCKKED UP CORRUPT SYSTEM I CHALLENGE ANY ATTORNEY WITH BALLS TO CHALLENGE ME YOU ALLKNOW WHAT A NEAT LITTLE CLICK YOU HAVE, WHRN I WAS IN COURT ALL THE ATTORNEYS WERE HSAPY AND SMILING . N AND JOKING AROUND I WOULD BE TOO IF I WERE MAKING $400.00 AN HOUR COMPARED TO MY $15.00 PER HOUR.. I HOPE ALL YOU SLIME BALL ATTORNEYS LAY IN A NURSING HOME IN YOUR OWN EXCREMRNT FOR TEN YEARS, JUST REMEMBER, <BR/>WHAT GOES AROUND COMES AROUND EVERY ONE HAS TO PAY FOR THEIR CONDUCT. DID THE ATTORNEYS LEARN THAT IN LAW SCHOOL OR ALL ABOUT GREED---. PISSED OFF FIREMAN P S --I WITNESSED LOTS TO TRADEGY IN MY LINE OF WORK AND NOBODY <BR/>IS IMMUNE ALL YOU GREEDY ATTORNEYS, THE FIREMAN THAT SAVED YOUR LIFE OR OF UOYR KID MAY BE THE ONE YOU SCREWED IN COURTAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5166169592714997268.post-21311233223358391322009-01-13T08:09:00.000-06:002009-01-13T08:09:00.000-06:00There is no evidence that they both took the deduc...There is no evidence that they both took the deduction for the child. In fact, only one did, Pardo.<BR/><BR/>Second, to the above poster, while I understand your anger, violence is never the answer. Work to change the system peacefully. It must be changed because it is unfair.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5166169592714997268.post-76551721731515245842009-01-12T22:28:00.000-06:002009-01-12T22:28:00.000-06:00having gone thru a bitter divorce I understand his...having gone thru a bitter divorce I understand his behaviour , I laid awake many nights thinking how to kill her and her slim ball attorneys. THEse BASTARDS MADE ME LOOK LIKE A FELON I worked 3 jobs all my married life had million dollar homes did not screw around . My ex wife had an adgenda she got one half of all the property I had prior to marriage We spent 5 years in court due to her anger It cost me well over two million dollars , the attorneys milked this for all it was worth I have to pay alimony of $750.00 per month and she makes well over $1000.00 per month than me. the judge was very biased and i was unable to defend myself against the lies and half truths I am a 73 year old retired fireman on a disibility pension. The legal system is a farce all the attorneys and judges are in bed togther they go to parties luncheons and social events togther. I feel like i was totaly sold out.GO BLESS AMERICA AND THIS BIASED FRADULANT FUCKED UP LEGAL SYSTEM THIS IS WHAT I PUT MY LIFE ON THE LINE IN A COMBAT AERA TO DEFEND THIS BOGUS SYSTEM. ALSR GUSHSHOULED BE PUT ONTRIAL FOE HIS MISMANAGEMT OF THIS ONC EGREAT COUNTRYAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5166169592714997268.post-76696681876468798252009-01-10T13:09:00.000-06:002009-01-10T13:09:00.000-06:00To anonymousJanuary 7, 2009 3:26 PMRegarding cheat...To anonymous<BR/>January 7, 2009 3:26 PM<BR/><BR/>Regarding cheating on his taxes, you are the confused one. The endless prattle about his tax cheating involved him taking a deduction on the disabled son he had no contact with. Please ask your tax man if (1) it is legal to take a dependent deduction on a child you have no contact with and (2) if it is possible for a divorced couple to both take a dependent deduction on the same child. <BR/><BR/>The answer to (1) is yes, it is done all the time and is legal if the parent who has custody of the child is willing to let the non-custodial parent take the deduction. The answer to (2) is NO, the IRS will flag it immediately. It's not something you can hide from the IRS, anymore than you could hide the goodyear blimp in your backyard. Double deducting is one of the first things the IRS looks at with any dependent deduction.<BR/><BR/>Putting (1) and (2) together, therefore means if Pardo was taking the deduction on that disabled son from the past wife and mother of that son, then the mother was not taking a deduction. The only way that could happen is if there was an agreement between the two. Those kinds of agreements are legal, and are made all the time, often based on the fact that even though the child is not living with the non-custodial parent, the non-custodial parent has made some financial sacrifices which merit him getting the dedcution. Perhaps the $100,000 (not exactly small change) the mother of the disabled child got out of Pardo's home insurance had something to do with that.<BR/><BR/>Regarding Pardo deserting his disabled son, you conveniently omit to mention how according to the mother he spent a week every day and night at the hospital after it happened. Definitely the sign of a cold, uncaring father, right? Subsequently there was no contact according to the mother, but of course millions of dads don't see their kids, and the mothers always say they just abandonned the children, but if you took the time to look at the court records you would see endless attempts by the father to gain some kind of custody or visitation, all to no avail because courts almost always give custody to the mother and could care a less about enforcing any visitation on the fathers part. The mothers are free to then play any number of endless games to make it difficult for the father to see their child, and after a few years of that agony the father gives up.In my case after not being able to see my daughter for months I petitioned the court to help me with visitation. Their response: we need to raise your child support to the mother because you are no longer caring for the daughter. Gee, thanks for you help! <BR/><BR/>Regarding Pardo's ex not receiving any payments, she would have gotten them eventually. It goes on his arrearage account. When you buy something on your credit card, you don't pay for it immediately but you owe the money eventually unless you declare bankruptcy. The only difference is that With alimony/child support, you cannot erase the debt with bankruptcy, it stays with you for life plus 10% interest. And by the way, I find it sooooo funny that Pardo's ex- was leaving him because he was scum, but had no trouble trying to get as much money from him as she could. In other words, Pardo is scum but his money is great! How convenient to look down your highbrow nose at someone, but at the same time help yourself to everything in their pockets. <BR/><BR/>Bottom line, no matter what Pardo or the average husband/father does, they cannot win in court. Every move they make and everything they say and do is used against them, until finally, one day, some of them snap.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5166169592714997268.post-48343645830431490642009-01-07T20:15:00.000-06:002009-01-07T20:15:00.000-06:00YOu want us to believe Pardo was a bad guy before ...YOu want us to believe Pardo was a bad guy before the divorce to his recent wife. Even assuming you are correct, the fact remains that the family law system pushed him over the edge.<BR/><BR/>You are wanting to justify the system. It can't be justified. It is the trigger that sets unstable people over the edge. Accept it.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5166169592714997268.post-83739031259711811062009-01-07T15:26:00.000-06:002009-01-07T15:26:00.000-06:00Anonymous,You seem confused about the timelines, a...Anonymous,<BR/><BR/>You seem confused about the timelines, and the order in which everything happened. When he applied for a job under an assumed name, it was not because he was desperate for money. On the contrary, he did all of that years before he ever met Sylvia Pardo.<BR/><BR/>Pardo falsified time sheets when he worked at JPL. He worked at JPL from the mid-1980's to the early 90's. Long before he met Sylvia Pardo. For that reason (among others) he was fired from JPL.<BR/><BR/>He also left a woman at the alter around that time.<BR/><BR/>After he was fired from JPL, he tried, and succeeded, at getting hired under a fake identity. Eventually he was recognized, and re-fired, and escorted off the premises.<BR/><BR/>Again, all this happened in the early 90's, before he ever got married, before he met Sylvia Pardo.<BR/><BR/><BR/>Also, he was cheating on his taxes before he met her. Also, he was responsible for his son nearly drowning and becoming seriously disabled. Again, he did all of this before he met her.<BR/><BR/><BR/>Finally, look at the timeline of their divorce. she asks for a divorce in the spring of 2008, and as a response he kicks her out of the house. In June, he's ordered to pay temporary spousal support, as she can't afford to pay rent anywhere else. This spousal support was a temporary arrangement, only until the divorce was settled.<BR/><BR/>At the time (June, 2008) he was still employed. Then, in July 2008, he loses his job and gets no severance, and no unemployment compensation. The fact that he got no severance or unemployment means either:<BR/><BR/>1) he quit his job.<BR/>2) he was fired for cause.<BR/><BR/>If he had been fired as part of a downsizing (ie no fault of his own) he would have gotten unemployment.<BR/><BR/>Now you may ask, "why would he quit his job". Go read recommendations of the men's rights movement. One of their tips for avoiding paying alimony is to get "fired". That way you can plead hardship and not pay out anything.<BR/><BR/>The divorce was settled in December, 6 months later. In that period of time, he paid her nothing. The final settlement, all spousal support was waived. He was ordered to pay her $10K, but that was arguably less than the amount she had contributed to their joint savings account, which had at one point (before he cleaned it out) over $80K.<BR/><BR/>For someone who typically makes 6-figures (like he did) a one-time payment of $10K is not that much of a hardship. And, it was not alimony, it was shared assets.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5166169592714997268.post-69915987959666374032009-01-03T14:21:00.000-06:002009-01-03T14:21:00.000-06:001:40 You are a Saint!1:40 You are a Saint!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5166169592714997268.post-61223982401160688562009-01-03T13:40:00.000-06:002009-01-03T13:40:00.000-06:00Thanks Anon 12:58 except I am a woman. Women are p...Thanks Anon 12:58 except I am a woman. Women are paying spousal support, alimony and child support and are facing the same issues plus there is prejudice against us because there is a stereotype that only men are affected by this.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5166169592714997268.post-87894340693148752332009-01-03T12:58:00.000-06:002009-01-03T12:58:00.000-06:00ANON 6:04, You are being ripped off. God bless men...ANON 6:04, You are being ripped off. God bless men like you who do not get violent dispite getting taken to the cleaners.<BR/><BR/>Yup, the system is broke. I for one admit it!<BR/><BR/><BR/>AnneAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5166169592714997268.post-13292115561002630202009-01-03T12:45:00.000-06:002009-01-03T12:45:00.000-06:00Folks, you are welcome to discuss Legal Pub's prop...Folks, you are welcome to discuss Legal Pub's proposed solution to domestic violence or the general fairness or unfairness of the family court system on my web site.<BR/><BR/>I am a divorce attorney who enjoys hosting any intelligent discussion.<BR/><BR/>ViperViperhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05681737307667407346noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5166169592714997268.post-77712930896072934862009-01-03T12:40:00.000-06:002009-01-03T12:40:00.000-06:00ANON 7:58!Excellent! You captured what so many of...ANON 7:58!<BR/><BR/>Excellent! You captured what so many of us are trying to say. We are not defending Pardo. We are explaining what happens to men. They snap in family court!<BR/><BR/>Counselors want to tell people that the system is broke but they can't break confidences.<BR/><BR/>It is going to get even more violent if men do not have the opportunity to face a more fair system!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5166169592714997268.post-39774922526978718052009-01-02T19:58:00.000-06:002009-01-02T19:58:00.000-06:00SarahW, your response is more intelligent than the...SarahW, your response is more intelligent than the norm (and sounds slightly attorney-ish, are you involved with this case?) and you don't resort to name calling anyone who believes the divorce system snapped Pardo, so kudos to you for that. You are right that Pardo's divorce at first glance is not a posterchild for a man really getting screwed, especially since no children between them were involved and the marriage was short term. But the fact remains that so many men have gotten so badly screwed in Family Court (and continue to be screwed) that it has left a legacy of incredible anger and bitterness which resonates with what Pardo did. Pardo obviously had some serious demons unrelated to the divorce, and he snapped where many men who have had it worse were able to maintain.<BR/><BR/><BR/>Regardless, he still represents the anger and rage Family Court has left in all those men who got shafted by the system. Are you a parent, SaraW? Have you ever been ordered to see your children 4 days a month? Or not seen them at all for years. Have you ever had your house given to somebody else? Had your drivers license suspended, half your paycheck garnished, your passport canceled, your credit rating trashed? Have you ever had a judge speak down sarcastically to you as he would to a criminal? Not all of this was happening to Pardo, but I guarantee you a lot of it was. His own mother was testifying against him in court. You write a long list of all his failings, including falsyfing time sheets and lying to get his job back etc... Isn't that the sign of a financially desperate man? In criticizing him for this, you actually exemplify what happens in court to the man. He cannot win. He is ordered to come up with money that he simply cannot come up with. If he resorts to desperate means to get that money, then he is a lowlife for doing that. In other words, shame on you Pardo for lying to get that money, now go ahead and hand it over to us, we'll take care of it for you! LOL! Total hypocrisy! As for never making any payments... he was out of work, otherwise trust me the court would have been taking half his paychecks. They can and do garnish your paycheck within a few weeks of starting any employment. And they don't exactly ask your permission, either. And missing payments is irrelevant anyways since the ex- will get that money eventually, plus interest. Every penny of the payments he did not make, would eventually have been squeezed out of him the minute he got a job, again garnished out of his paycheck. <BR/><BR/><BR/>As for the whole control issues you point out in him, it didn't sound like he was exactly clinging to her, since he put her furniture out on the lawn. If you want to mention control issues, I think the real control issue here is a greedy, drunk-with-power Family Court system that has no checks or balances, operates outside of Constitutional Rights, and is filled with $350/hour divorce attorneys, 200K/year judges who used to be divorce attorneys, and money hungry ex-wives, all addicted to the tax free cash flow from the ex-husbands, and happy to suck every penny they can from these men and essentially turn them into a slave labor for the next 20 or 30 years. Then they pretend to be shocked and surprised when somebody snaps, and chalk it up to another psychotic madman. There is, of course, no acknowledgement of their own revolting greed and dishonesty. Might makes right, and the winners (court system and ex-wives) get to write history, all couched in beautiful words like "what's best for the kids". Which translated, actually means what's best for THEM.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5166169592714997268.post-70151862401160644492009-01-02T18:07:00.000-06:002009-01-02T18:07:00.000-06:00I have to say you don't make a lot of sense. It ...I have to say you don't make a lot of sense. It does not seem connected to anything I said.<BR/><BR/>Plus, you misstate what I said.<BR/>I did not say what I think you imply, that all divorcing wives always accept modest settlements. <BR/><BR/>Bruce did not go off the bend because he got a raw deal. He is also the author of his own misfortunes, not the victim.SarahWhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04557172584578880603noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5166169592714997268.post-77292370166931693652009-01-02T18:04:00.000-06:002009-01-02T18:04:00.000-06:00I make a 6 figure salary and I get under $200.00 e...I make a 6 figure salary and I get under $200.00 every two weeks in pay. The rest goes to my ex who has a sound surround system, a SUV completely paid off by me, a huge network of computers and every technoloy device invented, a fully paid apartment and paid vacations. That's just a start. I'm sure what I don't know about is another 100k worth of stuff I've paid for. Most of this was bought from spousal support. I don't know where the other Anon. gets off saying that it's minimal payments. This needs to stop in the US. It's a crime against humanity.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5166169592714997268.post-66017882785193121182009-01-02T17:51:00.000-06:002009-01-02T17:51:00.000-06:00"it was always modest and always going to be limit..."it was always modest and always going to be limited and temporary, with the final settlement ajusted for it"<BR/><BR/>How ridiculous. Always modest? Really? How insulting to me. I have paid a hobo through the nose for 4+ years and didn't get compensated a penny when divorce was settled.<BR/><BR/>Take a look at WIC (Women Infants and Children). It's a good program because it useses ENFORCEMENT to make sure that families only buy appropriate items.<BR/><BR/>The child support system should be the same. It should not be a blank check for lazy people. It should let families buy APPROPRIATE items for families and have a list of them. Money should be collected when there is a true NEED, not just x$ per month that falls into a black hole of all kinds of stupid things.<BR/><BR/>I think it's time we start writing congress and form a website. <BR/><BR/>Whether Pardo was lying or not is irrelevant. The system rewards lazy men and women who just want to vegetate and collect checks. Both parents have a responsibility to provide for a child, not just one.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5166169592714997268.post-3031276585065638812009-01-02T15:10:00.000-06:002009-01-02T15:10:00.000-06:00The focus on "the broken divorce system" is border...The focus on "the broken divorce system" is bordering on ridiculous. The finalization of his marriage breakup is obviously the nexus of his revenge-plan, the insult to his ego, but HE's the broken thing; it says nothing about the divorce system - that's a total red-herring. <BR/><BR/> He did not get taken to the cleaners, and his own actions have more to do with his misfortunes than anyone else's do.<BR/><BR/>Why would you make THIS case a poster for unfair divorce? It was reasonable for the court to order Pardo to provide some temporary spousal support under the law, under the specific circumstances of that marriage ( it was always modest and always going to be limited and temporary, with the final settlement ajusted for it); child support and custody was never an issue; the final settlement was not only rationally related to the joint assets accumulated in marriage, but rationally related to <BR/>the contribution of this specific woman to assets accumulated during marriage. All support (which Pardo never paid) was subsumed in the final settlement, too. And Pardo said he did not want the dog. Perhaps he felt otherwise, and falsely claimed so for some perverse reason of his own, but he never asked for the dog in the settlement, and said Sylvia could have the family dog, told her he didn't want it.<BR/><BR/>The loss of his sense of control of his life seems to be the real trigger, FEAR of Sylvia getting the upperhand, rather than her actually getting the upperhand in reality, seems to have been a huge stress on Pardo. <BR/><BR/>He broke her heart with his treatment of her and his inexplicable and very serious lies and deception.<BR/><BR/>He lost his job the same way. <BR/><BR/>I think it likely he offended the court with come very obvious, almost comical, lying, and he may have made the court less inclined to take his statements at face value.<BR/><BR/>And if he wanted to stay married, he sure gave a pretty bad impression of that to Sylvia. He acted the whole time like he was just fine with ending the marriage. In fact, he'd stopped being a loving partner before Sylvia found out how severely she'd been deceived in regard to Matthew Pardo. Acted like he just didn't care to be married anymore.<BR/><BR/>Since he did that in numerous previous relationships, why is this necessarily Sylvia's fault?<BR/><BR/>If Bruce cared so much for keeping money away from Sylvia, he could just as easily enacted every part of his plan except the murdering part. Grab the cash, blow town and start over under a new name in a new town. If that was his end-game, why is the mass murder, shoot everyone in the face part needed?<BR/><BR/>It's not because Sylvia got a modest settlement, or had the power to decide herself to leave and get any financial assistance to leave. <BR/><BR/>It's because she was in the drivers seat, and he felt like nobody gets to cheat anybody but ME! I am the one to win or everybody dies. I may not want you, but god forbid you leave. I SAY WHEN I AM DONE WITH YOU! I get to lie about my education, put in false time sheets, get rehired under a false name. <BR/>I am the one who leaves women at the altar. I am the one who clears out the joint account!!! (Delia, now you know how lucky a break he gave you by taking the cash and disappearing for two months).<BR/><BR/>Pardo was angry because all his devious plans kept blowing up in his face. All his attempts to control and deceive kept backfiring. And he blamed everyone else for his own misdeeds.SarahWhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04557172584578880603noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5166169592714997268.post-87081856203280332152009-01-02T12:25:00.000-06:002009-01-02T12:25:00.000-06:00Anon 10:28. I am with you. Where do we start to c...Anon 10:28. I am with you. Where do we start to change this horrible system?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5166169592714997268.post-30134203943259454812009-01-02T10:08:00.000-06:002009-01-02T10:08:00.000-06:00As for thinking that the $17,000 dollars is a lot ...As for thinking that the $17,000 dollars is a lot of money, it's obvious that anyone who isn't paying child support/alimony would think that.<BR/><BR/>Anyone who pays child support/alimony MUST live a cash lifestyle. If you lose your job or get behind on payments (God forbid that you yourself may have medical bills or other emergencies - courts care nothing about that) you will still have to pay.<BR/><BR/>What they do is to take ALL money out of your bank accounts. If you have overdraft protection, they run it up to the max. This is why people who pay child support/alimony should NEVER have overdraft protection.<BR/><BR/>What that means is after they run your accounts into a negative situation, you will be on the street begging, calling friends, churches anyone to get your next meal including asking someone at mcdonalds if there is any spare food.<BR/><BR/>Do you need to save cash? ABSOLUTELY! That way when all money is ripped off you will still be able to eat. Considering the expenses of relocating etc. 17,000 isn't that much.<BR/><BR/>There's nothing like every payday withdrawing all money except for $10 to keep the account open because of a greedy man who refuses to work and uses a child as a pawn to live a lazy lifestyle.<BR/><BR/>Af for the vechicles, so what, he had to have a way to get around. Good luck selling them the way the economy is.<BR/><BR/>What Pardo did was sick but the violence will continue until the system is changed. Someone needs to start some protests.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5166169592714997268.post-5705614577135503322009-01-01T10:13:00.000-06:002009-01-01T10:13:00.000-06:00Anon 4:26, I can see your point. Pardo was wrong....Anon 4:26, I can see your point. Pardo was wrong. He had to be crazy to take innocent lives. But there seems to be little doubt that it was the divorce that put him over the edge.<BR/><BR/>Let's all work for a better system with less violence in the new year.Legal Pubhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03464130635305514783noreply@blogger.com